Download java for os x 2015 001 wont open install#

When you install the JDK, it also installs the JRE. Administrator privileges are required to install the JDK and JRE on macOS. Installing the JDK and JRE on macOS is performed on a systemwide basis for all users. You cannot install Java for a single user. The following are the system requirements for installing the JDK and the JRE on macOS: If I close LO6203 and switch back to LO6152, I get asked the same question again, when I load up a database requiring any kind of Java instantiation (hsqldb, or any wizard function that relies on Java). I then have to go through the rigmarole of redefining my JDK11 as the selected environment, in order to continue working with my ODB file. Under LibreOffice - Preferences - LibreOffice - Advanced, select the Java execution environment that you want LibreOffice to use' (translated from the French). 'The configuration of LibreOffice has been changed. a connection to mysql via a JDBC driver, I get an error message after having authenticated my user against the database : If I now start LO6203, and load up a JDBC configured database file, e.g. I activated the radio button and then shut down LO. I then started LO6152, and under Preferences - Advanced, I added the path to the JDK, which was found by LO's detection routine and added to the list. I have downloaded and copied the untarred package (jdk-11.jdk) to In current production release versions (61), the annoying problem of Java detection (or lack thereof) has come back, albeit in a slightly different form, with OpenJDK11. I will happily respond to prompts to diagnose, etc., but I've reached the limits of my ability at this point. I use Base happily on Ubuntu, and would seriously like to be able to access Base on OSX as well. I have read through this thread more than once, and have no more options. I have spent several hours (more than 4, less than 10) trying to solve this, and have failed miserably. ДЄnd it seems I have no 'embedded' database of any kind: I cannot create a db from within the app. The problem is that my LibO Options have the `LibreOffice > Advanced` 'Use a Java runtime environment' greyed out - it is impossible to use that tool. Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.172-b11, mixed mode)Д®xport JAVA_HOME='/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0_172.jdk/Contents/Home' Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_172-b11) I don't know if this should be registered as a new bug, but given the number of duplicates here, I'll report my experience and if it needs its own space, so be it. This was automatically detected by LO 5152.ДЇrom comment 26, a second confirmation that the JDK is detected on OSX 10.9.5, so maybe we should close this now as WFM (I have no idea which, if any, commit fixed this). However, I have just tested removing the existing (and now outdated) JDK version I had on my MBPro OSX 10.9.5 machine, and installed the latest JDK8_u111. In bug 94716, comments 14 and 20 confirmed this. > don't have such an old OS X available.) Can you confirm it? > Hence, my question whether anybody can actually confirm that. > on old versions of OS X (10,8, 10.9), or whether that's an unproven claim. > whether that change also really caused LO to not even support (Oracle) JDKs > some version of LO (5.1, as you say), LO only supports (Oracle) JDKs, no > I'm not sure whether that answers my question. (In reply to Stephan Bergmann from comment #10) (I myself don't have such an old OS X available.) Can you confirm it? Hence, my question whether anybody can actually confirm that.

However, what I'm unsure about is whether that change also really caused LO to not even support (Oracle) JDKs on old versions of OS X (10,8, 10.9), or whether that's an unproven claim. I do understand that, since some version of LO (5.1, as you say), LO only supports (Oracle) JDKs, no longer any plain (Apple, Oracle) JREs. I'm not sure whether that answers my question.

> No support for Apple JRE or Oracle JRE - just the JDK. > So, through 5.0, if Apples Java 1.6 is present, a JRE 1.8 will be detected > It is old NOTOURBUG bug 74877 - and Oracle's Java runtime collision with > Can anybody actually confirm that on OS X 10.8 or 10,9 an installation of an > I'm a bit confused by the history of this bug and bug 94716 it got cloned > (In reply to Stephan Bergmann from comment #8) (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #9)

Download java for os x 2015-001 wont open